A training program for engineering teams

Ship more with Claude.
Teach your team how.

A hands-on workshop that turns Claude from a toy your devs tried once into a daily multiplier across your engineering organization.

4-hour Essentials 2-day Deep Dive On-site or remote
The shift

Developers working with AI are pulling away from the ones who aren't.

The gap is no longer about who uses Claude — almost everyone has tried it. It's about who knows how to wield it: scoping work for it, building harnesses around it, and recovering when it goes sideways.

Productivity delta · fluent vs. casual user
3–5×
Observed throughput difference on comparable tasks between a fluent Claude user and a colleague still copy-pasting into a web UI.
What good looks like

Four skills separate a fluent operator from a tourist.

Plan

Scope work so Claude can execute it. Break it down before it breaks down on you.

Context

Load the right files, docs, and constraints. Context is the new prompt.

Harness

Give Claude tools and guardrails — agents, skills, and a project structure.

Review

Treat output as a draft, not a verdict. Inspect, correct, steer.

Do the math, just once

A Claude seat costs roughly 1% of a senior dev's loaded monthly cost.

$15k
Monthly loaded cost of one senior dev
$200
Claude seat, top tier
2.6 hrs
/ week saved to break even

A trained team recovers the seat cost by Tuesday morning.

Assumes a $15k/mo loaded cost and a standard 160-hour work month. Trained teams typically see 15–40% productivity lift. The rest of the month is upside.

Two training packages

Pick the one that matches where your team is today.

Half-day

Essentials

4 hours · on-site or remote

For teams getting started. By the end, every dev in the room can scope, prompt, and steer Claude for real engineering work.

Best for: teams <3 mo in, or with inconsistent usage across devs.
What changes, 30 days after training

The compound effects across the team.

Faster shipping

Features land in days, not sprints — especially on routine or boilerplate-heavy work.

Smaller review load

PRs arrive with tests, docs, and a self-review already attached.

Less tribal knowledge

Conventions become skills; skills travel with the codebase.

More senior time for real problems

Less shepherding juniors through repetitive work. More architecture, fewer tickets.

Honest scoping

Who this is for — and who it isn't.

Good fit

  • Eng teams of 5–80 who've tried Claude unevenly
  • Orgs that want a consistent baseline across devs
  • Teams willing to change how they work, not just buy a tool
  • Leaders who want honest ROI, not vibes

Probably not

  • Teams looking for a one-hour magic demo
  • Orgs that want to outsource judgment to Claude entirely
  • Regulated contexts without a path to external tools
  • Leaders expecting AI to replace, rather than amplify, engineers
Let's talk

Book a 30-min discovery call.

Tell me about your team. I'll tell you whether the Essentials or Deep Dive fits — and what to expect 30 days after.